by Robert Dunn MBA, C.P.M.
In this short but very profound article you’ll find that omitting “Consideration” in a commercial contract - which is an important criteria for the formation of a valid agreement - is a basic mistake that even some attorneys (3 of them in our case example below) commit when it comes to business/commercial contracts.
The lack of this essential element can render a written contract invalid. Discover how did this happen and the form that consideration may take in a contract (it’s not only money).
Some time ago our firm was part of a project for a very large publishing company to develop their new portfolio of procurement contract templates. This meeting involved the procurement division leadership and three attorneys from the firm's general counsel's office.
One day, the client team was discussing two of the firm's old templates which would be part of the new library project. Those agreements were a Non-Disclosure-Agreement (NDA) with unilateral protections and a Mutual-Non-Disclosure Agreement (MNDA) with bilateral protections covering confidential information.
My colleague was asked for his opinion on the two documents, which had been developed by the legal group in the past. He responded by complimenting key portions of each document and commenting about how they could be streamlined and standardized in format. But then he made his most-serious observation, by asking where in either document was "Consideration" discussed...
Immediately, all three attorneys began leafing through the documents in front of them. Finally, the most-senior attorney's head swung around so he could glare at his two colleagues. Then he looked at my colleague, and said:
"Well, it seems we focused so much attention on language around confidentiality that we neglected to include a simple reference to 'Consideration' that would make these contracts legally-valid. Good catch."
You see, one of the essential elements for a legally-binding contract to exist under most bodies of law is that of "Consideration". The Latin expression for this is "Quid pro quo" which in English means "In exchange for". In a contract, value must be exchanged for value by both parties in order to have a binding agreement.
In most of the agreements we use in the field of procurement (purchase, lease, rental, services, license, etc.), consideration is usually a monetary amount being exchanged for a product or service provided by a supplier. But this is not always the case.
Barter agreements are still alive and well in the field of procurement...and are much more sophisticated than the original barter arrangements thousands of years ago whereby a farmer might exchange a bushel of grain for a chicken. These still continue today; although they can be complicated by tax regulations in calculating the actual value being proffered by each party.
No matter the form of consideration, any valid contract must clearly articulate what form of value each party will be exchanging under the arrangement. Failure to do that may mean that we don't have any of the protections we thought the document would provide.Home ›› Legal & Contract Terms ›› Consideration Business Law Contracts